An AI developer’s viral post about using a cloned version of his voice to read books to his baby has sparked widespread criticism online, raising fresh questions about the role of technology in parenting and the ethics of voice cloning.
The post, published on X on October 6 by user Alvin Sng, described a brief exchange with his wife about reading to their child. Sng wrote: ‘My wife: Can you read our baby a book? Me: I can just play an audiobook from my phone. My wife: But then it won’t be in your voice. Me: I can train a voice model. Parenting hits different when you work in AI.’
The post quickly drew reactions from users who questioned the decision to replace a personal, human interaction with a synthetic reproduction of the father’s voice.
One reply stated: ‘Shouldn’t your first instinct be to read your baby a book willingly as a father and to spend more time with your baby. If it wasn’t, I guess it’s time to think deeply on what you will lose if you trade your emotions for technology. Just a friendly advice.’
Another comment read: ‘You should save this tweet and circle back to it in 20 years when you’re confused about why your kid doesn’t talk to you anymore.’
The criticism reflects broader concerns about voice cloning technology that have been building throughout 2026. In August, more than 80 performers, including actors Matt Lucas, Hugh Bonneville, and Nicola Coughlan, signed a letter to the UK government demanding legislation that would give every person a legal right to own their voice.
Audiobook narrator Alice Sockett, who co-founded the campaign, described voice cloning as ‘an existential threat to our entire industry.’ She said: ‘My voice is out there in the public domain but completely unprotected. We’re seeing voice theft increase every week.’
Scottish singer Sandi Thom, another signatory, said: ‘Behind that voice is the emotion, the life, the pain, the tears and joy that I’ve felt along the way. Without creativity, we are nothing.’
Other voices in the entertainment industry have similarly voiced concerns. In September, actor George Clooney spoke on the topic at the Venice International Film Festival, while legal action over voice-related rights has been initiated in the United States and Germany.
In Germany, the professional association for voice actors, Verband Deutscher Sprecher:innen, lodged a competition complaint with the Federal Cartel Office over Netflix licensing agreements that would reportedly enable the company to use actors’ voices for AI training and the creation of synthetic voices.
The association said its members are being pressured to assign rights in their voice to Netflix and expressed worry that voice actors could be put out of work.
Legal systems have also begun to address the issue. On September 30, 2026, the Tokyo District Court ruled on a case concerning the alleged imitation of Japanese actor Kenjiro Tsuda’s voice using AI technology. The court recognized that a person’s voice can be protected by publicity rights, marking the first time a Japanese court has done so.
The court reasoned that a human voice, like a person’s likeness, can serve as a symbol of that person’s identity, and that unauthorized use may infringe publicity rights where the voice has customer-attracting power and the use is aimed solely at exploiting that commercial attraction.
Chinese state media has also weighed in on the risks of the technology. Xinhua News Agency published a commentary in August warning that AI voice cloning poses a threat to social trust, citing cases of fraud where criminals mimic the voices of family members to deceive elderly people into transferring savings.
The commentary noted that AI cloning software and custom voice services can be purchased on e-commerce and second-hand platforms for as little as a few thousand Korean won to tens of thousands of won.
The commentary stated that the core problem is the low cost of voice theft infringement paired with the high difficulty of protecting rights, and that if the authenticity of voices becomes difficult to distinguish, social trust will be severely damaged.
Also Read: Russian Missile and Drone Strikes Kill at Least 24 Across Ukraine on Putin’s Birthday
As of October 8, 2026, Sng has not issued a public response to the criticism of his viral post. The broader debate over voice cloning and its implications for human connection continues to develop, with the UK government consultation on digital replicas still pending.
